On Wed, Apr 09, 2025 at 09:55:36AM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> Until GC is enhanced to not unshared reflinked blocks we better prohibit
> this combination.
>
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
...or gc figures out how to do reflinked moves. Either way,
Reviewed-by: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@xxxxxxxxxx>
--D
> ---
> mkfs/xfs_mkfs.c | 8 ++++++++
> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/mkfs/xfs_mkfs.c b/mkfs/xfs_mkfs.c
> index 7d4114e8a2ea..0e351f9efc32 100644
> --- a/mkfs/xfs_mkfs.c
> +++ b/mkfs/xfs_mkfs.c
> @@ -2957,6 +2957,14 @@ _("rt extent size not supported on realtime devices with zoned mode\n"));
> }
> cli->rtextsize = 0;
> }
> + if (cli->sb_feat.reflink) {
> + if (cli_opt_set(&mopts, M_REFLINK)) {
> + fprintf(stderr,
> +_("reflink not supported on realtime devices with zoned mode specified\n"));
> + usage();
> + }
> + cli->sb_feat.reflink = false;
> + }
>
> /*
> * Force the rtinherit flag on the root inode for zoned file
> --
> 2.47.2
>
>
