Re: [PATCH v6 00/13] large atomic writes for xfs with CoW

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 00/13] large atomic writes for xfs with CoW
From: John Garry <john.g.garry@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2025 08:44:27 +0000
Cc: brauner@xxxxxxxxxx, djwong@xxxxxxxxxx, cem@xxxxxxxxxx, dchinner@xxxxxxxxxx, linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-fsdevel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, ojaswin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, ritesh.list@xxxxxxxxx, martin.petersen@xxxxxxxxxx, tytso@xxxxxxx, linux-ext4@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20250318054810.GA14955@lst.de>
Organization: Oracle Corporation
References: <20250313171310.1886394-1-john.g.garry@oracle.com> <20250318054810.GA14955@lst.de>
User-agent: Mozilla Thunderbird

On 18/03/2025 05:48, Christoph Hellwig wrote:

As said before what I'd really like to see going along with this is
a good set of test for xfstests, including exercising the worst case
of the atomic always COW writes.

ok, fine. We already had something for the forcealign stuff, so canrework that.


Thanks

References:
- [PATCH v6 00/13] large atomic writes for xfs with CoW
  - From: John Garry
- Re: [PATCH v6 00/13] large atomic writes for xfs with CoW
  - From: Christoph Hellwig

Prev by Date: Re: [bug report] xfs: use vmalloc instead of vm_map_area for buffer backing memory
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH v6 11/13] xfs: add xfs_file_dio_write_atomic()
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH v6 00/13] large atomic writes for xfs with CoW
Next by thread: [PATCH] xfs: Fix spelling mistake "drity" -> "dirty"
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [XFS Filesystem Development (older mail)] [Linux Filesystem Development] [Linux Audio Users] [Yosemite Trails] [Linux Kernel] [Linux RAID] [Linux SCSI]

Powered by Linux