Re: [report] Unixbench shell1 performance regression

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Mar 18, 2025 at 10:03:10AM +0800, Gao Xiang wrote:
> Anyway, I've got the community view of Unixbench.  I will arrange my
> own TODO list.

FYI, while I agree with all of Dave's observation on Unixbench I don't
entirely agree with the conclusion.  Yes, we should not bend over
backwards to optimize for this workload.  But if we can find an easy
enough way to improve it I'm all in favour.  While everyone should
know not to do subsector writes there's actually still plenty of
workloads that do.  And while those are not the heavily optimized ones
that really matter it would still be nice to get good numbers for them.

So if you can find a way to optimize it without much negative impact
I'd love to see that.




[Index of Archives]     [XFS Filesystem Development (older mail)]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Trails]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux