On Thu Sep 11, 2025 at 6:39 AM MDT, Amir Goldstein wrote: > On Thu, Sep 11, 2025 at 2:29 PM Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> On Wed, Sep 10, 2025 at 03:49:27PM -0600, Thomas Bertschinger wrote: >> > This is to support using open_by_handle_at(2) via io_uring. It is useful >> > for io_uring to request that opening a file via handle be completed >> > using only cached data, or fail with -EAGAIN if that is not possible. >> > >> > The signature of xfs_nfs_get_inode() is extended with a new flags >> > argument that allows callers to specify XFS_IGET_INCORE. >> > >> > That flag is set when the VFS passes the FILEID_CACHED flag via the >> > fileid_type argument. >> >> Please post the entire series to all list. No one has any idea what your >> magic new flag does without seeing all the patches. >> > > Might as well re-post your entire v2 patches with v2 subjects and > cc xfs list. > > Thanks, > Amir. Thanks for the advice, sorry for messing up the procedure... Since there are a few quick fixups I can make, I may go straight to sending v3 with the correct subject and cc. Any reason for me to not do that -- is it preferable to resend v2 right away with no changes?
