On Wed, 23 Jul 2025 07:35:44 +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> xfs_zone_record_blocks not only records successfully written blocks that
> now back file data, but is also used for blocks speculatively written by
> garbage collection that were never linked to an inode and instantly
> become invalid.
>
> Split the latter functionality out to be easier to understand. This also
> make it clear that we don't need to attach the rmap inode to a
> transaction for the skipped blocks case as we never dirty any peristent
> data structure.
>
> [...]
Applied to for-next, thanks!
[1/1] xfs: split xfs_zone_record_blocks
commit: f76823e3b284aae30797fded988a807eab2da246
Best regards,
--
Carlos Maiolino <cem@xxxxxxxxxx>
