On Wed, Jul 23, 2025 at 12:00:48PM +0530, Ojaswin Mujoo wrote: > On Thu, Jul 17, 2025 at 09:22:30AM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote: > > On Sat, Jul 12, 2025 at 07:42:50PM +0530, Ojaswin Mujoo wrote: > > > Stress file with atomic writes to ensure we excercise codepaths > > > where we are mixing different FS operations with atomic writes > > > > > > Suggested-by: Ritesh Harjani (IBM) <ritesh.list@xxxxxxxxx> > > > Signed-off-by: Ojaswin Mujoo <ojaswin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > Hrm, doesn't generic/521 test this already if the fs happens to support > > atomic writes? > > > > --D > > Hi Darrick, > > Yes but I wanted one with _require_scratch_write_atomic and writes going > to SCRATCH fs to explicitly test atomic writes as that can get missed in > g/521. > > Would you instead prefer to have those changes in g/521? Oh, I see. You're setting the opsize to awu_max so that you're guaranteed to get maximally sized atomic writes, which might not happen with regular g521. Ok I'm convinced, Reviewed-by: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@xxxxxxxxxx> --D > Regards, > Ojaswin >
