Re: [PATCH v3 07/13] generic/1228: Add atomic write multi-fsblock O_[D]SYNC tests

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Jul 17, 2025 at 09:35:10AM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote:

<snip>

> > +verify_atomic_write() {
> > +	if [[ "$1" == "shutdown" ]]
> > +	then
> > +		local do_shutdown=1
> > +	fi
> > +
> > +	test $bytes_written -eq $awu_max || _fail "atomic write len=$awu_max assertion failed"
> > +
> > +	if [[ $do_shutdown -eq "1" ]]
> > +	then
> > +		echo "Shutting down filesystem" >> $seqres.full
> > +		_scratch_shutdown >> $seqres.full
> > +		_scratch_cycle_mount >>$seqres.full 2>&1 || _fail "remount failed for Test-3"
> > +	fi
> > +
> > +	check_data_integrity
> > +}
> > +
> > +mixed_mapping_test() {
> > +	prep_mixed_mapping
> > +
> > +	echo "+ + Performing O_DSYNC atomic write from 0 to $awu_max" >> $seqres.full
> > +	bytes_written=$($XFS_IO_PROG -dc "pwrite -DA -V1 -b $awu_max 0 $awu_max" $testfile | \
> > +		        grep wrote | awk -F'[/ ]' '{print $2}')
> > +
> > +	verify_atomic_write $1
> 
> The shutdown happens after the synchronous write completes?  If so, then
> what part of recovery is this testing?
> 
> --D

Right, it is mostly inspired by [1] where sometimes isize update could
be lost after dio completion. Although this might not exactly be
affected by atomic writes, we added it here out of caution.

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/fstests/434beffaf18d39f898518ea9eb1cea4548e77c3a.1695383715.git.ritesh.list@xxxxxxxxx/
> 
> > +}
> > +




[Index of Archives]     [XFS Filesystem Development (older mail)]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Trails]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux