On Mon, Jul 14, 2025 at 04:41:17PM -0400, Brian Foster wrote:
> The bug checks at the top of iomap_write_begin() assume the pos/len
> reflect exactly the next range to process. This may no longer be the
> case once the get folio path is able to process a folio batch from
> the filesystem. On top of that, len is already trimmed to within the
> iomap/srcmap by iomap_length(), so these checks aren't terribly
> useful. Remove the unnecessary BUG_ON() checks.
>
> Signed-off-by: Brian Foster <bfoster@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
Heh, glad this went away
Reviewed-by: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@xxxxxxxxxx>
--D
> ---
> fs/iomap/buffered-io.c | 5 +----
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/iomap/buffered-io.c b/fs/iomap/buffered-io.c
> index 3729391a18f3..38da2fa6e6b0 100644
> --- a/fs/iomap/buffered-io.c
> +++ b/fs/iomap/buffered-io.c
> @@ -805,15 +805,12 @@ static int iomap_write_begin(struct iomap_iter *iter, struct folio **foliop,
> {
> const struct iomap_folio_ops *folio_ops = iter->iomap.folio_ops;
> const struct iomap *srcmap = iomap_iter_srcmap(iter);
> - loff_t pos = iter->pos;
> + loff_t pos;
> u64 len = min_t(u64, SIZE_MAX, iomap_length(iter));
> struct folio *folio;
> int status = 0;
>
> len = min_not_zero(len, *plen);
> - BUG_ON(pos + len > iter->iomap.offset + iter->iomap.length);
> - if (srcmap != &iter->iomap)
> - BUG_ON(pos + len > srcmap->offset + srcmap->length);
>
> if (fatal_signal_pending(current))
> return -EINTR;
> --
> 2.50.0
>
>
