Re: [PATCH v2 00/13] xfs: tracing: remove unused event xfs_reflink_cow_found

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Jul 08, 2025 at 06:09:32PM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> 
> Should this go through the XFS tree, or should I take it?

This is in XFS tree for a while now:

https://web.git.kernel.org/pub/scm/fs/xfs/xfs-linux.git/?h=xfs-6.17-merge

https://lore.kernel.org/linux-xfs/aF6a1GhCdT_llDSm@xxxxxxxxxxxxx/T/#mae0757697a557087c723de553b7ccd2bb7a39c9c


Carlos

> 
> -- Steve
> 
> 
> On Mon, 16 Jun 2025 13:51:46 -0400
> Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> > Trace events take up to 5K in memory for text and meta data. I have code that
> > will trigger a warning when it detects unused tracepoints[1]. The XFS file
> > system contains many events that are not called. Most of them used to be called
> > but due to code refactoring the calls were removed but the trace events stayed
> > behind.
> >
> > Some events were added but never used. If they were recent, I just reported
> > them, but if they were older, this series simply removes them.
> >
> > One is called only when CONFIG_COMPACT is defined, so an #ifdef was placed
> > around it.
> >
> > Finally, one event is supposed to be a trace event class, but was created with
> > the TRACE_EVENT() macro and not the DECLARE_EVENT_CLASS() macro. This works
> > because a TRACE_EVENT() is simply a DECLARE_EVENT_CLASS() and DEFINE_EVENT()
> > where the class and event have the same name. But as this was a mistake, the
> > event created should not exist.
> >
> > [1] https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-trace-kernel/cover/20250612235827.011358765@xxxxxxxxxxx/
> >
> > Changes since v1: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-trace-kernel/20250612212405.877692069@xxxxxxxxxxx/
> >
> > - Removed the first patch that mistakenly removed xfs_reflink_cow_found
> >
> > - Change subjects to start with lowercase
> >
> > - Removed xfs_attr events that are used in an #if 0 section instead of
> >   adding #if 0 around them
> >
> > - I added: Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
> >   to all patches but the one with the modified #if 0 as Christoph
> >   said he looked at them all.
> >
> > Steven Rostedt (13):
> >       xfs: remove unused trace event xfs_attr_remove_iter_return
> >       xfs: remove unused event xlog_iclog_want_sync
> >       xfs: remove unused event xfs_ioctl_clone
> >       xfs: remove unused xfs_reflink_compare_extents events
> >       xfs: remove unused trace event xfs_attr_rmtval_set
> >       xfs: remove unused xfs_attr events
> >       xfs: remove unused event xfs_attr_node_removename
> >       xfs: remove unused event xfs_alloc_near_error
> >       xfs: remove unused event xfs_alloc_near_nominleft
> >       xfs: remove unused event xfs_pagecache_inval
> >       xfs: remove usused xfs_end_io_direct events
> >       xfs: only create event xfs_file_compat_ioctl when CONFIG_COMPAT is configure
> >       xfs: change xfs_xattr_class from a TRACE_EVENT() to DECLARE_EVENT_CLASS()
> >
> > ----
> >  fs/xfs/scrub/trace.h |  2 +-
> >  fs/xfs/xfs_trace.h   | 68 ++--------------------------------------------------
> >  2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 67 deletions(-)
> 




[Index of Archives]     [XFS Filesystem Development (older mail)]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Trails]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux