On Thu, 3 Jul 2025 06:50:24 -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Wed, Jul 03, 2025 at 08:09:12PM +0800, Jinliang Zheng wrote: > > ltp and xfstests showed no noticeable errors caused by this patch. > > With what block and page size? I guess it was block size < PAGE_SIZE > as otherwise you wouldn't want to optimize this past, but just asking > in case. Hahaha, I really want to try -b size=512, but I don't want to turn off crc, so I can only choose -b size=1024. By the way, the test was done on xfs. thanks, Jinliang Zheng. :)
