On Mon, Jun 30, 2025 at 07:42:33AM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 27, 2025 at 11:14:05AM -0400, Brian Foster wrote:
> > > struct iomap_writeback_ops {
> > > - int (*map_blocks)(struct iomap_writeback_ctx *wpc, struct inode *inode,
> > > - loff_t offset, unsigned len);
> > > - int (*submit_ioend)(struct iomap_writeback_ctx *wpc, int status);
> > > - void (*discard_folio)(struct folio *folio, loff_t pos);
> > > + int (*writeback_range)(struct iomap_writeback_ctx *wpc,
> > > + struct folio *folio, u64 pos, unsigned int len, u64 end_pos);
> >
> > Whitespace damage on the above line.
>
> Without this the vim syntax highlighting is confused for the rest of the
> file unfortunately. Not sure how to deal with it, the RST formatting
> keeps driving me crazy. As does this document, which really should
> not duplicate the type information, but folks really wanted this
> annoyingly redundant information that is a huge pain to maintain for no
> gain at all :(
>
Ok NBD, just pointing out the tab/whitespace mix.
Brian
