On Tue, Jun 24, 2025 at 03:59:53PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > I'm all for killing this typedef, but the name of both the union and the > typedef is just horrible as it describes an on-disk log record. > > Maybe replace the union name with something like xlog_rec or xlog_record > first, update the comment above the definiton and only then kill the > typedef? > Yes, that sounds much better.
