+ Jes Bitterblue Smith <rtl8821cerfe2@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 25/08/2025 08:57, Ping-Ke Shih wrote: > > Алексей Смирнов <debugger94@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> I have been using this Wi-Fi dongle for many years now and have had no > >> problems with it. The device is quite old and known, dumping its efuse to > >> the log and asking the user to send the results to Jes.Sorensen@xxxxxxxxx > >> on every boot makes little sense. Please apply: > > > > I'll rephrase commit message when I merge this: > > > > wifi: rtl8xxxu: Remove TL-WN722N V2 (0x2357: 0x010c) from untested devices > > > > This Wi-Fi dongle has been used for many years now and have had no problems > > with it. The device is quite old and known, dumping its efuse to the log and > > asking the user to send the results to Jes.Sorensen@xxxxxxxxx on every boot > > makes little sense. > > > > Signed-off-by: Алексей Смирнов <debugger94@xxxxxxxxx> > > Reviewed-by: Ping-Ke Shih <pkshih@xxxxxxxxxxx> > > > >> > >> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtl8xxxu/core.c > >> b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtl8xxxu/core.c > >> index 831b5025c634..113e01df0902 100644 > >> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtl8xxxu/core.c > >> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtl8xxxu/core.c > >> @@ -7815,7 +7815,7 @@ static int rtl8xxxu_probe(struct usb_interface *interface, > >> untested = 0; > >> break; > >> case 0x2357: > >> - if (id->idProduct == 0x0109 || id->idProduct == 0x0135) > >> + if (id->idProduct == 0x0109 || id->idProduct == 0x010c > >> || id->idProduct == 0x0135) > >> untested = 0; > >> break; > >> case 0x0b05: > > > > I propose we simply remove the entire list of tested devices. It's not > particularly useful to tell people to report if a device works or not. > If it doesn't work they will report it anyway. This untested flag was added since 2015 at first commit, but I wasn't here at that time. Jes, could you please comment this untested report of efuse is still useful now?
