Qianfeng Rong <rongqianfeng@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > The 'ret' variable stores returns from other functions, which return > either zero on success or negative error codes on failure. Storing > error codes in u32 (an unsigned type) causes no runtime issues but is > stylistically inconsistent and very ugly. Change 'ret' from u32 to > int - this has no runtime impact. > > Signed-off-by: Qianfeng Rong <rongqianfeng@xxxxxxxx> Acked-by: Ping-Ke Shih <pkshih@xxxxxxxxxxx>