On Thu, 2025-09-11 at 12:08 +0200, Johannes Berg wrote: > Please pull and let us know if there's any problem. Speaking of problems ... we've kept adding Link: tags. If you're going to insist we remove them then please just say so explicitly, reject this pull request as well if you like, and save everyone the discussion. I do truly believe Linus to be wrong on this: assuming a patch has no need for any identification/correlation whatsoever before it goes into his (or a feeder) tree (and gets a stable sha1) is akin to assuming it has no life before it actually ends up there, which I think is completely out of touch with reality. But he does ultimately get to reject pull requests, so... Maybe I should make the links go to patchwork, because there you have the CI results ... maybe that could be construed as useful information in the "Linus sense" (phrased that way because to me the mailing list posting is already useful information)? johannes
