On Thu, Jul 24, 2025 at 12:18 AM Johannes Berg <johannes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Maybe so, but it really looks like a bandaid?! Why are we trying to > remove it twice in the first place? Thanks, Johannes. I agree this patch is only defensive and does not address the root cause. I am currently tracing the sta_info_destroy flow to determine whether this is caused by a duplicate free or an unsynchronized access to sta->debugfs_dir. If the race is confirmed, I will follow up with a more complete fix that properly handles the lifecycle.
