On Tue, 2025-07-22 at 17:22 +1000, Lachlan Hodges wrote: > On Tue, Jul 22, 2025 at 05:16:38PM +1000, Lachlan Hodges wrote: > > (1) I've run hwsim tests and (obviously) tested the S1G power save path, > > but the 2 hwsim power save tests only check multicast traffic and > > even then only 1 sta. So would be good for someone to confirm that this > > hasn't broken non-S1G tim encoding. Even though it's only code being > > shuffled around, that wouldn't be ideal :) > > Something I forgot to mention (my file didn't save ._.) is that I aim to get > some S1G hwsim tests up and running soon as S1G is almost fully functional > within mac80211 (1 maybe 2 more patchsets left) such that there is some > standardised testing utilising hwsim. That's awesome :-) A question on that topic: In your experience - since surely you also work with real hardware - is it plausible that hardware has both S1G and "regular" WiFi support (2.4/5/6 GHz)? Because hwsim does that and it's caused some issues with the large number of channels and such before, so I wonder if we shouldn't be more realistic and at least make the default not be that, unless we ever expect real HW to exist that does all of S1G/2.4/5/6 combined? johannes
