Search Linux Wireless

Re: Disconnection triggered by Puncture advertisement

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On 7/14/2025 6:23 PM, Johannes Berg wrote:
> On Mon, 2025-07-14 at 18:09 +0800, Baochen Qiang wrote:
>>>> This 'punctured' is suddenly (I mean even 'EHT Operation' was not seen in previous
>>>> beacons)
>>>
>>> Pretty sure there must've been EHT operation before, otherwise we
>>> couldn't connect with EHT, and you had multi-link.
>>
>> Sorry for misleading, I was not clear. I was trying to say 'EHT Operation Parameters' in
>> beacon was always 0 AFTER AssocResp, until this sudden 'punctured' frame.
>>
>> Of course 'EHT operation' was always seen in the beacon frames.
> 
> Right, OK.
> 
> [snip]
> 
> AP information:
> 
>>         Tag: HT Information (802.11n D1.10)
>>             Tag Number: HT Information (802.11n D1.10) (61)
>>             Tag length: 22
>>             Primary Channel: 36
>>             HT Information Subset (1 of 3): 0x05
>>                 .... ..01 = Secondary channel offset: Secondary channel is above the
>> primary channel (0x1)
>>                 .... .1.. = Supported channel width: Channel of any width supported
> 
> So HT is 40 MHz, that's of course fine.
> 
>>         Tag: VHT Operation
>>             Tag Number: VHT Operation (192)
>>             Tag length: 5
>>             VHT Operation Info
>>                 Channel Width: 80 MHz, 160 MHz or 80+80 MHz BSS Bandwidth (1)
>>                 Channel Center Segment 0: 42
>>                 Channel Center Segment 1: 0
> 
> VHT is 80 MHz (the 160 thing there is misleading) if the primary channel
> is 36 and the overall center is 42:
> 
> | 36 | 40 | 44 | 48 |
>           42
> 
>>         Ext Tag: HE Operation
>>             Ext Tag length: 6 (Tag len: 7)
>>             Ext Tag Number: HE Operation (36)
>>             HE Operation Parameters: 0x003ff4
>>                 .... .... .... .... .... .100 = Default PE Duration: 4
>>                 .... .... .... .... .... 0... = TWT Required: Not required
>>                 .... .... ..11 1111 1111 .... = TXOP Duration RTS Threshold: 1023
>>                 .... .... .0.. .... .... .... = VHT Operation Information Present: False
>>                 .... .... 0... .... .... .... = Co-Hosted BSS: False
>>                 .... ...0 .... .... .... .... = ER SU Disable: False
>>                 .... ..0. .... .... .... .... = 6 GHz Operation Information Present: False
>>                 0000 00.. .... .... .... .... = Reserved: 0x00
>>             BSS Color Information: 0x36
>>             Basic HE-MCS and NSS Set: 0xfffc
> 
> He doesn't say anything but it actually cannot unless it were on 6 GHz,
> so that's fine.
> 
> 
> So yeah, the AP is misbehaving. Now you might argue that as we have EHT
> we shouldn't care? Dunno. But basically we don't want to initially
> _connect_ to such an AP that's confusing itself with puncturing ... we'd
> connect with HE since there it says no puncturing. But while maintaining
> the connection because of the code structure it suddenly looks like it
> "lost" EHT because the EHT was not well-implemented and we ignore it ...
> 
>>> I don't know. I have a feeling that perhaps the AP is misbehaving and
>>> setting HE operation to 80 MHz as well (which is invalid if EHT
>>
>> So what's the expected bandwidth in HE Operation? 40 MHz or less?
> 
> Whatever narrowing of the bandwidth is needed to not include the
> subchannels disabled by puncturing. Could be 40, or could perhaps even
> be 20 if the puncturing bitmap was 0x2 instead of 0x8.
> 
> After all, an HE client knows nothing about puncturing, so it will
> always use the full bandwidth advertised, if something is punctured in
> the HE part of the channel that's the entirely wrong thing for it to do.
> 
> Btw, this is also covered by the spec (I have P802.11be/D7.0 at hand
> right now):
> 
> 35.15.1 Basic EHT BSS operation
> [...]
> If a BSS operating channel width is announced in the EHT Operation
> element, then an EHT AP shall announce the BSS operating channel
> width(s) to non-EHT non-AP STAs with the following restrictions:
> 
> - [...]
> - If the Disabled Subchannel Bitmap subfield in the EHT Operation
>   element is present, the announced BSS operating channel width(s) to
>   non-EHT non-AP STAs is the maximum width including the primary channel
>   without covering any punctured 20 MHz subchannel indicated in the
>   Disabled Subchannel Bitmap subfield in the EHT Operation element as
>   defined in 35.15.2 (Preamble puncturing operation).
> 

Thank you Johannes, really great explanation and I totally agree with your opinion!

> johannes





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Host AP]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Wireless Personal Area Network]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Wireless Regulations]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Kernel]     [IDE]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Hiking]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]

  Powered by Linux