Hi Krzysztof, On Fri, Jul 04, 2025 at 10:03:27AM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > On 04/07/2025 09:54, Sakari Ailus wrote: > > pm_runtime_put_autosuspend(), pm_runtime_put_sync_autosuspend(), > > pm_runtime_autosuspend() and pm_request_autosuspend() now include a call > > to pm_runtime_mark_last_busy(). Remove the now-reduntant explicit call to > > pm_runtime_mark_last_busy(). > > > > Signed-off-by: Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > The cover letter of the set can be found here > > <URL:https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pm/20250704075225.3212486-1-sakari.ailus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>. > > > > In brief, this patch depends on PM runtime patches adding marking the last > > busy timestamp in autosuspend related functions. The patches are here, on > > rc2: > > > > You did not send cover letter to people, so this changelog should > explain what I should do with this patch (what is the merging/dependency). I didn't as it would have had too many recipients (more than 200 in fact). As you may have noticed, the URL for the cover letter is a few lines above, also its Message-ID can be found in the In-reply-to: header. -- Kind regards, Sakari Ailus
