> Seems there's not that much point in splitting a 67 line patch and a 7 line patch > (#3) that really belong together? Sure, merged together. > > > + if (!wdev->owner_nlportid) > > + genlmsg_multicast_netns(&nl80211_fam, wiphy_net(&rdev- > >wiphy), > > + msg, 0, NL80211_MCGRP_NAN, gfp); > > + else > > + genlmsg_unicast(wiphy_net(&rdev->wiphy), msg, > > + wdev->owner_nlportid); > > I feel like perhaps the new design should just enforce the owner? > Otherwise how would all of this possibly work ... any application starts > listening and sending frames? Seems like a recipe for confusion. I'll enforce here owner nl port. > > johannes
