On Mon, Jul 7, 2025 at 12:15 PM Ping-Ke Shih <pkshih@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote： > > > > On Mon, Jul 7, 2025 at 10:46 AM Ping-Ke Shih <pkshih@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > From: Ping-Ke Shih <pkshih@xxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > > > The regulations enabling 6GHz WiFi [1] of WiFi Alliance lists CEPT > > > countries including > > > - Albania (AL) > > > - Andorra (AD) > > > - Austria (AT) > > > - Belarus (BY) > > > - Belgium (BE) > > > - Georgia (GE) > > > - Iceland (IS) > > > - Liechtenstein (LI) > > > - Macedonia, The Former Yugoslav Republic of (MK) > > > - Moldova, Republic of (MD) > > > - Monaco (MC) > > > - Montenegro (ME) > > > - Norway (NO) > > > - Russian Federation (RU) > > > - Switzerland (CH) > > > - Türky (TR) > > > - Ukraine (UA) > > > > This is slightly confusing because the CEPT document lists 46 countries. > > As the (force/preferred) date mentioned in ECC/DEC/(20)01, I think > CEPT countries should > implement 6 GHz regulation, but to be conservative, I only add > countries listed in > Wi-Fi Alliance. I see. > > > > > Add 6 GHz frequency entry if not being added yet. > > > > Please add the links to [2][3] to all of them. And could you also add > > the link to the other countries that already have a 6 GHz entry? Just > > so we know that they are harmonized. > > Did you want me filling all CEPT countries with 6 GHz entry or only > listed countries in this commit message? > I'd prefer latter one. Please let me know your thinking. Thank you. Only listed ones then. However, if you do notice any of the other CEPT countries already have 6 GHz enabled, please add it as well. ChenYu > > > > > But being pending to add rules to below entires because countries are not > > ^ entries > > > existing yet: > > > > As in, no entry in the database exists? > > > > Probably rewrite this as: > > > > The following are skipped as they do not have corresponding entries in > > the database yet. Adding an entry just for 6 GHz would cause 2.4 GHz and > > 5 GHz bands from the world domain to stop working. > > Thanks for the advice.
