On Mon, 2025-05-19 at 09:54 +0800, Wentao Liang wrote: > The wilc_sdio_read_init() calls wilc_sdio_cmd52() but does not check the > return value. This could lead to execution with potentially invalid data > if wilc_sdio_cmd52() fails. A proper implementation can be found in > wilc_sdio_read_reg(). This seems fairly much pointless, if the caller is never going to check the return value anyway? > 2.42.0.windows.2 Really? Did you even _build_ the changes yourself? johannes
