Search Linux Wireless

Re: [PATCHv5 0/5] wifi: ath9k: add ahb OF support

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 6/19/2025 10:39 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 20/06/2025 07:32, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> On 20/06/2025 02:33, Jeff Johnson wrote:
>>> On 6/8/2025 8:08 PM, Rosen Penev wrote:
>>>> First two commits are small cleanups to make the changes of the third
>>>> simpler. The fourth actually adds dts definitions to use ahb.
>>>>
>>>> v2: Add documentation, use kernel_ulong_t, and of_device_get_match_data
>>>> v3: Use qcom prefix and wifi suffix as in other ath drivers.
>>>> v4: fix up dts example in Documentation
>>>> v5: move back to using qca prefix. It makes no sense to diverge between
>>>> all the other drivers for MIPS based qualcomm devices. qcom as a prefix
>>>> is used for Quallcomm's ARM(64) stuff.
>>>>
>>>> Rosen Penev (5):
>>>>   wifi: ath9k: ahb: reorder declarations
>>>>   wifi: ath9k: ahb: reorder includes
>>>>   wifi: ath9k: ahb: replace id_table with of
>>>>   dt-bindings: net: wireless: ath9k: add OF bindings
>>>>   mips: dts: qca: add wmac support
>>>>
>>>>  .../bindings/net/wireless/qca,ath9k.yaml      | 23 ++++++-
>>>>  arch/mips/boot/dts/qca/ar9132.dtsi            |  9 +++
>>>>  .../boot/dts/qca/ar9132_tl_wr1043nd_v1.dts    |  4 ++
>>>>  arch/mips/boot/dts/qca/ar9331.dtsi            |  9 +++
>>>>  arch/mips/boot/dts/qca/ar9331_dpt_module.dts  |  4 ++
>>>>  .../mips/boot/dts/qca/ar9331_dragino_ms14.dts |  4 ++
>>>>  arch/mips/boot/dts/qca/ar9331_omega.dts       |  4 ++
>>>>  .../qca/ar9331_openembed_som9331_board.dts    |  4 ++
>>>>  arch/mips/boot/dts/qca/ar9331_tl_mr3020.dts   |  4 ++
>>>>  drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/ahb.c          | 60 +++++++------------
>>>>  10 files changed, 84 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>
>>> DT team, should I take this series through my tree?
>>> Toke, Ack?
>> No, of course not. The same as you asked some time ago: DTS never, NEVER
>> goes via driver subsystem tree.
>>
> 
> Heh, you do not have any subsystem maintainers acks or reviews on DTS,
> so this should not be considered. It's like me taking wireless patches
> without your acks.

That is why I was looking for clarification.
All the DT stuff had your R-B and hence why I asked Toke for his Ack.
Will DT team take the entire series (I'm ok with that)?
Or just the DTS and I should take the rest?

/jeff




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Host AP]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Wireless Personal Area Network]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Wireless Regulations]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Kernel]     [IDE]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Hiking]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]

  Powered by Linux