On Thu, 2025-05-15 at 22:28 +0530, Sarika Sharma wrote:
>
> Yes, this is needed when we don't really want to report the pertid at
> MLO level( as currently pertid is one of links data(deflink) for MLO).
I'm not sure it makes sense at all. Why would we have mac80211 provide
some data that we then discard immediately? Maybe we can
if (WARN_ON(pertid_data)) {
kfree(pertid_data);
pertid_data = NULL;
}
for userspace consistency, but I think we should really avoid doing work
to create data that doesn't make sense and isn't needed.
johannes
