On 5/15/2025 4:56 PM, Johannes Berg wrote:
On Thu, 2025-05-15 at 11:18 +0530, Sarika Sharma wrote:
+/**
+ * struct link_station_info - link station information
+ *
+ * Link station information filled by driver for get_station() and
+ * dump_station().
+ * @link_id: Link ID uniquely identifying the link STA. This is -1 for non-ML
Oh also, the link_id shouldn't be in here, the documentation is wrong (-
1 is never used that way), and it's already indexed by link ID so it's
just a source of errors to have two values that should be the same...
Sure, was using in previous design to check for deflink, here we can
directly use from link_sta.
Let me remove it and use existing link_id.
And yes this implies changes to patch 9, but those are _good_, having
the link ID implicit in the output structure seems awkward.
Okay, sure.
johannes