On Thu, 2025-05-15 at 10:49 +0530, Sarika Sharma wrote: > > > > Also, is there any specific reason to want to allocate each link > > individually? Why not allocate them all together in one bigger > > allocation? Doesn't matter much though I guess. > > > > Also, while implementing I think this way looks clean and easy to parse > the links using link_id, also while allocating/de-allocating pertid for > link level, at least to me. > So I would keep this like this only? > OK sure, whatever? I like I said before, we can change these internal details later too. johannes
