On Fri, Mar 28, 2025 at 03:36:43PM +0100, Johan Hovold wrote:
> Commits b88cbaaa6fa1 ("PCI/pwrctrl: Rename pwrctl files to pwrctrl") and
> 3f925cd62874 ("PCI/pwrctrl: Rename pwrctrl functions and structures")
> renamed the "pwrctl" framework to "pwrctrl" for consistency reasons.
>
> Rename also the Kconfig symbols so that they reflect the new name while
> adding entries for the deprecated ones. The old symbols can be removed
> once everything that depends on them has been updated.
I considered changing the Kconfig symbols at the time, but didn't do
it because I didn't want to break existing .config files. Is that not
a concern? Or do you think the long-term benefit is worth having
users re-answer these config questions?
We have lots of Kconfig symbols that are not what we would choose
today, e.g., my misguided suggestion years ago to use "CONFIG_PCI_*"
instead of "CONFIG_PCIE_*" for PCIe controller drivers that didn't
have any PCIe content.
If we do want this, I would think we should squash all these so we
don't have breakage between this patch and the following ones.
Bjorn
