On Wed, Mar 19, 2025 at 11:32:40AM +0100, Francesco Dolcini wrote: > On Fri, Mar 07, 2025 at 11:10:21AM +0100, Sascha Hauer wrote: > > On Thu, Mar 06, 2025 at 11:17:15AM +0100, Francesco Dolcini wrote: > > > + Jeff Chen <jeff.chen_1@xxxxxxx>, tsung-hsien.hsieh@xxxxxxx > > > + Stefan Roese <sr@xxxxxxx> > > > > > > On Mon, Mar 03, 2025 at 12:05:26PM +0100, Sascha Hauer wrote: > > > > I am worried about the future of the mwifiex driver. NXP has an ongoing > > > > effort of forking the driver to support their new chips, but the forked > > > > driver lacks support for the old chips supported by the current mwifiex > > > > driver. > > > > > > > > Overall this leaves us and our customers using the mwifiex driver in a > > > > very bad situation. Johannes made clear that he is not going to merge a > > > > driver that is 70% identical to the existing driver and on the other > > > > hand the existing driver doesn't get forward due to its odd-fixes state > > > > and the potential rise of a new driver which would render work on the > > > > existing driver useless. > > > > > > While I agree on the challenging situation, I would not call it "very > > > bad" ... as you know there are multiple people with stake on this driver > > > (I added SR in Cc here, that I just discovered has some interested on > > > this). > > > > > > In the short term I think that improving mwifiex driver is going to be > > > beneficial for everybody, currently this is not going as smooth as we'd > > > like, as you wrote and as already commented by Brian. > > > > > > And the next step would be to figure out how to enable newer Wi-Fi chip > > > solution from NXP in mainline, we all have our ideas and we are not > > > moving forward. NXP keeps pushing for a solution that was already > > > rejected multiple times and so far it was not successful on explaining > > > why this is the correct way forward. Here I would agree that the > > > situation is "very bad" at the moment. > > > > I have a patch adding iw61x support to the mwifiex driver. Maybe if I > > send that for inclusion we can get NXP to explain to us what's actually > > missing in this patch to properly support it. > > I would have HW available to test it, and not just review the code, > looking forward to it. Great! I just sent the series out, you are on Cc. Sascha -- Pengutronix e.K. | | Steuerwalder Str. 21 | http://www.pengutronix.de/ | 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 | Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |
