On Fri, Mar 21, 2025 at 06:14:49PM +0100, Lorenzo Bianconi wrote: > > On Thu, Mar 20, 2025 at 08:19:14PM +0000, Qasim Ijaz wrote: > > > If link_conf_dereference_protected() or mt7996_vif_link() > > > or link_sta_dereference_protected() fail the code jumps to > > > the error_unlink label and returns ret which is uninitialised. > > > > > > Fix this by setting err before jumping to error_unlink. > > > > > > Fixes: c7e4fc362443 ("wifi: mt76: mt7996: Update mt7996_mcu_add_sta to MLO support") > > > Fixes: dd82a9e02c05 ("wifi: mt76: mt7996: Rely on mt7996_sta_link in sta_add/sta_remove callbacks") > > > Signed-off-by: Qasim Ijaz <qasdev00@xxxxxxxxx> > > > --- > > > drivers/net/wireless/mediatek/mt76/mt7996/main.c | 12 +++++++++--- > > > 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/mediatek/mt76/mt7996/main.c b/drivers/net/wireless/mediatek/mt76/mt7996/main.c > > > index 91c64e3a0860..78f7f1fc867e 100644 > > > --- a/drivers/net/wireless/mediatek/mt76/mt7996/main.c > > > +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/mediatek/mt76/mt7996/main.c > > > @@ -998,16 +998,22 @@ mt7996_mac_sta_add_links(struct mt7996_dev *dev, struct ieee80211_vif *vif, > > > continue; > > > > What about if the list is empty or we hit this continue on every link? > > we will return 0 and I guess that's fine, agree? > Fine by me? regards, dan carpenter