On 3/19/2025 7:43 AM, Ping-Ke Shih wrote: > >> @@ -3450,7 +3450,9 @@ static void ath12k_recalculate_mgmt_rate(struct ath12k *ar, >> } >> >> sband = hw->wiphy->bands[def->chan->band]; >> - basic_rate_idx = ffs(bss_conf->basic_rates) - 1; >> + basic_rate_idx = ffs(bss_conf->basic_rates); >> + if (basic_rate_idx) >> + basic_rate_idx -= 1; > > Using __ffs() might be more readable, like > > u8 basic_rate_idx = 0; > > ... > > if (bss_conf->basic_rates) > basic_rate_idx = __ffs(bss_conf->basic_rates); > > > Thanks for the suggestion. I'll change this in my next version.