Re: [PATCH RFC net-next 4/7] net: ethtool: add get_rxrings callback to optimize RX ring queries

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, 05 Sep 2025 10:07:23 -0700 Breno Leitao wrote:
> +	int	(*get_rxrings)(struct net_device *dev);

I think this can return u32..
The drivers can't possibly fail to know how many queues they have.
We already do that for get_rxfh_*_size callbacks

>  	void	(*get_pause_stats)(struct net_device *dev,
>  				   struct ethtool_pause_stats *pause_stats);
>  	void	(*get_pauseparam)(struct net_device *,
> diff --git a/net/ethtool/ioctl.c b/net/ethtool/ioctl.c
> index 1a9ad47f60313..2f3dbef9eb712 100644
> --- a/net/ethtool/ioctl.c
> +++ b/net/ethtool/ioctl.c
> @@ -1208,6 +1208,22 @@ static noinline_for_stack int ethtool_set_rxnfc(struct net_device *dev,
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> +static int get_num_rxrings(struct net_device *dev)

This one has to indeed keep returning int, until we get rid of
get_rxnfc fallback completely.

> +{
> +	const struct ethtool_ops *ops = dev->ethtool_ops;
> +	struct ethtool_rxnfc rx_rings;
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	if (ops->get_rxrings)
> +		return ops->get_rxrings(dev);
> +
> +	ret = ops->get_rxnfc(dev, &rx_rings, NULL);
> +	if (ret < 0)
> +		return ret;
> +
> +	return rx_rings.data;
> +}
> +
>  static noinline_for_stack int ethtool_get_rxrings(struct net_device *dev,
>  						  u32 cmd,
>  						  void __user *useraddr)
> @@ -1217,16 +1233,17 @@ static noinline_for_stack int ethtool_get_rxrings(struct net_device *dev,
>  	const struct ethtool_ops *ops = dev->ethtool_ops;
>  	int ret;
>  
> -	if (!ops->get_rxnfc)
> +	if (!ops->get_rxnfc && !ops->get_rxrings)
>  		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
>  
>  	ret = ethtool_rxnfc_copy_struct(cmd, &info, &info_size, useraddr);
>  	if (ret)
>  		return ret;
>  
> -	ret = ops->get_rxnfc(dev, &info, NULL);
> -	if (ret < 0)
> -		return ret;
> +	if (WARN_ON_ONCE(info.cmd != ETHTOOL_GRXRINGS))
> +		return -EOPNOTSUPP;

I think malicious user space can trigger this warning with a TOCTOU
race. Let's skip the check, it's not really needed?

> +	info.data = get_num_rxrings(dev);




[Index of Archives]     [KVM Development]     [Libvirt Development]     [Libvirt Users]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux