Simon Schippers wrote: > The implementation is inspired by ptr_ring_empty. > > Co-developed-by: Tim Gebauer <tim.gebauer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Signed-off-by: Tim Gebauer <tim.gebauer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Signed-off-by: Simon Schippers <simon.schippers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > include/linux/ptr_ring.h | 71 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 71 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/include/linux/ptr_ring.h b/include/linux/ptr_ring.h > index 551329220e4f..6b8cfaecf478 100644 > --- a/include/linux/ptr_ring.h > +++ b/include/linux/ptr_ring.h > @@ -243,6 +243,77 @@ static inline bool ptr_ring_empty_bh(struct ptr_ring *r) > return ret; > } > > +/* > + * Check if a spare capacity of cnt is available without taking any locks. > + * > + * If cnt==0 or cnt > r->size it acts the same as __ptr_ring_empty. cnt >= r->size? > + * > + * The same requirements apply as described for __ptr_ring_empty. > + */ > +static inline bool __ptr_ring_spare(struct ptr_ring *r, int cnt) > +{ > + int size = r->size; > + int to_check; > + > + if (unlikely(!size || cnt < 0)) > + return true; Does !size ever happen. Also no need for preconditions for trivial errors that never happen, like passing negative values. Or prefer an unsigned type. > + > + if (cnt > size) > + cnt = 0; > + > + to_check = READ_ONCE(r->consumer_head) - cnt; > + > + if (to_check < 0) > + to_check += size; > + > + return !r->queue[to_check]; > +} > + > +static inline bool ptr_ring_spare(struct ptr_ring *r, int cnt) > +{ > + bool ret; > + > + spin_lock(&r->consumer_lock); > + ret = __ptr_ring_spare(r, cnt); > + spin_unlock(&r->consumer_lock); > + > + return ret; > +} > + > +static inline bool ptr_ring_spare_irq(struct ptr_ring *r, int cnt) > +{ > + bool ret; > + > + spin_lock_irq(&r->consumer_lock); > + ret = __ptr_ring_spare(r, cnt); > + spin_unlock_irq(&r->consumer_lock); > + > + return ret; > +} > + > +static inline bool ptr_ring_spare_any(struct ptr_ring *r, int cnt) > +{ > + unsigned long flags; > + bool ret; > + > + spin_lock_irqsave(&r->consumer_lock, flags); > + ret = __ptr_ring_spare(r, cnt); > + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&r->consumer_lock, flags); > + > + return ret; > +} > + > +static inline bool ptr_ring_spare_bh(struct ptr_ring *r, int cnt) > +{ > + bool ret; > + > + spin_lock_bh(&r->consumer_lock); > + ret = __ptr_ring_spare(r, cnt); > + spin_unlock_bh(&r->consumer_lock); > + > + return ret; > +} Please only introduce the variants actually used.