[PATCH v3] vhost/net: Protect ubufs with rcu read lock in vhost_net_ubuf_put()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



When operating on struct vhost_net_ubuf_ref, the following execution
sequence is theoretically possible:
CPU0 is finalizing DMA operation                   CPU1 is doing VHOST_NET_SET_BACKEND
                             // ubufs->refcount == 2
vhost_net_ubuf_put()                               vhost_net_ubuf_put_wait_and_free(oldubufs)
                                                     vhost_net_ubuf_put_and_wait()
                                                       vhost_net_ubuf_put()
                                                         int r = atomic_sub_return(1, &ubufs->refcount);
                                                         // r = 1
int r = atomic_sub_return(1, &ubufs->refcount);
// r = 0
                                                      wait_event(ubufs->wait, !atomic_read(&ubufs->refcount));
                                                      // no wait occurs here because condition is already true
                                                    kfree(ubufs);
if (unlikely(!r))
  wake_up(&ubufs->wait);  // use-after-free

This leads to use-after-free on ubufs access. This happens because CPU1
skips waiting for wake_up() when refcount is already zero.

To prevent that use a read-side RCU critical section in vhost_net_ubuf_put(),
as suggested by Hillf Danton. For this lock to take effect, free ubufs with
kfree_rcu().

Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fixes: 0ad8b480d6ee9 ("vhost: fix ref cnt checking deadlock")
Reported-by: Andrey Ryabinin <arbn@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Suggested-by: Hillf Danton <hdanton@xxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Kuratov <kniv@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
v2:
* move reinit_completion() into vhost_net_flush(), thanks
  to Hillf Danton
* add Tested-by: Lei Yang
* check that usages of put_and_wait() are consistent across
  LTS kernels
v3:
* use rcu_read_lock() with kfree_rcu() instead of completion,
  as suggested by Hillf Danton

 drivers/vhost/net.c | 9 +++++++--
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/vhost/net.c b/drivers/vhost/net.c
index 6edac0c1ba9b..c6508fe0d5c8 100644
--- a/drivers/vhost/net.c
+++ b/drivers/vhost/net.c
@@ -99,6 +99,7 @@ struct vhost_net_ubuf_ref {
 	atomic_t refcount;
 	wait_queue_head_t wait;
 	struct vhost_virtqueue *vq;
+	struct rcu_head rcu;
 };
 
 #define VHOST_NET_BATCH 64
@@ -250,9 +251,13 @@ vhost_net_ubuf_alloc(struct vhost_virtqueue *vq, bool zcopy)
 
 static int vhost_net_ubuf_put(struct vhost_net_ubuf_ref *ubufs)
 {
-	int r = atomic_sub_return(1, &ubufs->refcount);
+	int r;
+
+	rcu_read_lock();
+	r = atomic_sub_return(1, &ubufs->refcount);
 	if (unlikely(!r))
 		wake_up(&ubufs->wait);
+	rcu_read_unlock();
 	return r;
 }
 
@@ -265,7 +270,7 @@ static void vhost_net_ubuf_put_and_wait(struct vhost_net_ubuf_ref *ubufs)
 static void vhost_net_ubuf_put_wait_and_free(struct vhost_net_ubuf_ref *ubufs)
 {
 	vhost_net_ubuf_put_and_wait(ubufs);
-	kfree(ubufs);
+	kfree_rcu(ubufs, rcu);
 }
 
 static void vhost_net_clear_ubuf_info(struct vhost_net *n)
-- 
2.34.1





[Index of Archives]     [KVM Development]     [Libvirt Development]     [Libvirt Users]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux