Re: [PATCH net-next v4] vsock/test: Add test for null ptr deref when transport changes

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 9 Jul 2025 at 17:26, Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Wed, 9 Jul 2025 at 16:54, Konstantin Shkolnyy <kshk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > I'm seeing a problem on s390 with the new "SOCK_STREAM transport change
> > null-ptr-deref" test. Here is how it appears to happen:
> >
> > test_stream_transport_change_client() spins for 2s and sends 70K+
> > CONTROL_CONTINUE messages to the "control" socket.
> >
> > test_stream_transport_change_server() spins calling accept() because it
> > keeps receiving CONTROL_CONTINUE.
> >
> > When the client exits, the server has received just under 1K of those
> > 70K CONTROL_CONTINUE, so it calls accept() again but the client has
> > exited, so accept() never returns and the server never exits.

Just to be clear, I was seeing something a bit different.
The accept() in the server is no-blocking, since we set O_NONBLOCK on
the socket, so I see the server looping around a failing accept()
(errno == EAGAIN) while dequeueing the CONTROL_CONTINUE messages, so
after 10/15 seconds the server ends on my case.

It seems strange that in your case it blocks, since it should be a
no-blocking call.

Stefano

> >
>
> Yep, I saw exactly the same issue while testing a new test.
> I already sent a fix:
> https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20250708111701.129585-1-sgarzare@xxxxxxxxxx/
>
> Please, send a T-b/R-b on that if you can.
>
> Stefano





[Index of Archives]     [KVM Development]     [Libvirt Development]     [Libvirt Users]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux