On Thu, May 29, 2025 at 09:29:14PM +0700, Bui Quang Minh wrote: > On 5/29/25 18:18, Maciej Fijalkowski wrote: > > On Tue, May 27, 2025 at 11:19:04PM +0700, Bui Quang Minh wrote: > > > This adds a test to test the virtio-net rx when there is a XDP socket > > > bound to it. There are tests for both copy mode and zerocopy mode, both > > > cases when XDP program returns XDP_PASS and XDP_REDIRECT to a XDP socket. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Bui Quang Minh <minhquangbui99@xxxxxxxxx> > > Hi Bui, > > > > have you considered adjusting xskxceiver for your needs? If yes and you > > decided to go with another test app then what were the issues around it? > > > > This is yet another approach for xsk testing where we already have a > > test framework. > > Hi, > > I haven't tried much hard to adapt xskxceiver. I did have a look at > xskxceiver but I felt the supported topology is not suitable for my need. To > test the receiving side in virtio-net, I use Qemu to set up virtio-net in > the guest and vhost-net in the host side. The sending side is in the host > and the receiving is in the guest so I can't figure out how to do that with > xskxceiver. I see - couldn't the python side be executing xdpsock then instead of your own app? I wouldn't like to end up with several xsk tools for testing data path on different environments. > > Thanks, > Quang Minh. > > >
