[PATCH net-next v2 2/3] vsock/test: retry send() to avoid occasional failure in sigpipe test

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



From: Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@xxxxxxxxxx>

When the other peer calls shutdown(SHUT_RD), there is a chance that
the send() call could occur before the message carrying the close
information arrives over the transport. In such cases, the send()
might still succeed. To avoid this race, let's retry the send() call
a few times, ensuring the test is more reliable.

Sleep a little before trying again to avoid flooding the other peer
and filling its receive buffer, causing false-negative.

Signed-off-by: Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
v2:
- add little sleep [Paolo]
---
 tools/testing/vsock/vsock_test.c | 38 +++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
 1 file changed, 30 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/testing/vsock/vsock_test.c b/tools/testing/vsock/vsock_test.c
index d0f6d253ac72..68f425af00cc 100644
--- a/tools/testing/vsock/vsock_test.c
+++ b/tools/testing/vsock/vsock_test.c
@@ -1058,17 +1058,34 @@ static void sigpipe(int signo)
 	have_sigpipe = 1;
 }
 
+#define SEND_SLEEP_USEC (10 * 1000)
+
 static void test_stream_check_sigpipe(int fd)
 {
 	ssize_t res;
 
 	have_sigpipe = 0;
 
-	res = send(fd, "A", 1, 0);
-	if (res != -1) {
-		fprintf(stderr, "expected send(2) failure, got %zi\n", res);
-		exit(EXIT_FAILURE);
+	/* When the other peer calls shutdown(SHUT_RD), there is a chance that
+	 * the send() call could occur before the message carrying the close
+	 * information arrives over the transport. In such cases, the send()
+	 * might still succeed. To avoid this race, let's retry the send() call
+	 * a few times, ensuring the test is more reliable.
+	 */
+	timeout_begin(TIMEOUT);
+	while(1) {
+		res = send(fd, "A", 1, 0);
+		if (res == -1)
+			break;
+
+		/* Sleep a little before trying again to avoid flooding the
+		 * other peer and filling its receive buffer, causing
+		 * false-negative.
+		 */
+		timeout_usleep(SEND_SLEEP_USEC);
+		timeout_check("send");
 	}
+	timeout_end();
 
 	if (!have_sigpipe) {
 		fprintf(stderr, "SIGPIPE expected\n");
@@ -1077,11 +1094,16 @@ static void test_stream_check_sigpipe(int fd)
 
 	have_sigpipe = 0;
 
-	res = send(fd, "A", 1, MSG_NOSIGNAL);
-	if (res != -1) {
-		fprintf(stderr, "expected send(2) failure, got %zi\n", res);
-		exit(EXIT_FAILURE);
+	timeout_begin(TIMEOUT);
+	while(1) {
+		res = send(fd, "A", 1, MSG_NOSIGNAL);
+		if (res == -1)
+			break;
+
+		timeout_usleep(SEND_SLEEP_USEC);
+		timeout_check("send");
 	}
+	timeout_end();
 
 	if (have_sigpipe) {
 		fprintf(stderr, "SIGPIPE not expected\n");
-- 
2.49.0





[Index of Archives]     [KVM Development]     [Libvirt Development]     [Libvirt Users]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux