Mina Almasry <almasrymina@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: >> >> The bind-rx op has "flags: [ admin-perm ]", should bind-tx also? > > The omission of admin-perm for tx is intentional. > > Binding a dmabuf to an rx queue should and is a privileged operation, > because basically the application doing the binding is taking > ownership of this rx queue. For TX, no such queue ownership is being > taken. The TX binding just gives the netdevice access to the dmabuf > dma-addresses so the netdevice can send from there. It's very similar > to a normal dma-map with normal memory. There is no need for privilege > checks. Thanks for the explanation. I couldn't find any mention of ownership in the docs.
