Re: [PATCH] ovl: properly print correct variable

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Jul 25, 2025 at 10:33 AM Antonio Quartulli
<antonio@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On 21/07/2025 22:38, Antonio Quartulli wrote:
> > In case of ovl_lookup_temp() failure, we currently print `err`
> > which is actually not initialized at all.
> >
> > Instead, properly print PTR_ERR(whiteout) which is where the
> > actual error really is.
> >
> > Address-Coverity-ID: 1647983 ("Uninitialized variables  (UNINIT)")
> > Fixes: 8afa0a7367138 ("ovl: narrow locking in ovl_whiteout()")
> > Signed-off-by: Antonio Quartulli <antonio@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >   fs/overlayfs/dir.c | 5 +++--
> >   1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/fs/overlayfs/dir.c b/fs/overlayfs/dir.c
> > index 30619777f0f6..70b8687dc45e 100644
> > --- a/fs/overlayfs/dir.c
> > +++ b/fs/overlayfs/dir.c
> > @@ -117,8 +117,9 @@ static struct dentry *ovl_whiteout(struct ovl_fs *ofs)
> >               if (!IS_ERR(whiteout))
> >                       return whiteout;
> >               if (PTR_ERR(whiteout) != -EMLINK) {
> > -                     pr_warn("Failed to link whiteout - disabling whiteout inode sharing(nlink=%u, err=%i)\n",
> > -                             ofs->whiteout->d_inode->i_nlink, err);
> > +                     pr_warn("Failed to link whiteout - disabling whiteout inode sharing(nlink=%u, err=%lu)\n",
>
> while re-reading this patch, I realized that the format string for
> PTR_ERR(..) was supposed to be %ld, not %lu...
>
> Sorry about that :(

No worries, but its not %ld either. the error is an int.

>
> Neil should I send yet another patch or maybe this can be sneaked into
> another change you are about to send?

Please test this fix suggested by Neil and send a patch to Christian.

--- a/fs/overlayfs/dir.c
+++ b/fs/overlayfs/dir.c
@@ -116,10 +116,10 @@ static struct dentry *ovl_whiteout(struct ovl_fs *ofs)
                inode_unlock(wdir);
                if (!IS_ERR(whiteout))
                        return whiteout;
-               if (PTR_ERR(whiteout) != -EMLINK) {
-                       pr_warn("Failed to link whiteout - disabling
whiteout inode sharing(nlink=%u, err=%lu)\n",
-                               ofs->whiteout->d_inode->i_nlink,
-                               PTR_ERR(whiteout));
+               err = PTR_ERR(whiteout);
+               if (err != -EMLINK) {
+                       pr_warn("Failed to link whiteout - disabling
whiteout inode sharing(nlink=%u, err=%i)\n",
+                               ofs->whiteout->d_inode->i_nlink, err);
                        ofs->no_shared_whiteout = true;
                }
        }

Thanks,
Amir.





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystems Devel]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux