On Wed, Apr 9, 2025 at 1:12 PM Miklos Szeredi <miklos@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Wed, 9 Apr 2025 at 10:25, Amir Goldstein <amir73il@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > On second thought, if unpriv user suppresses ovl_set_redirect() > > by setting some mock redirect value on index maybe that lead to some > > risk. Not worth overthinking about it. > > > > Attached patch removed next* variables without this compromise. > > > > Tested it squashed to patch 1 and minor rebase conflicts fixes in patch 2. > > It passed your tests. > > Thanks. > > One more change: in this patch we just want the consistency fix, not > the behavior change introduced in 2/3. So move the > ovl_check_follow_redirect() to before the lazy-data check here and > restore the order in the next patch. Right. > > Pushed to overlayfs/vfs.git#overlayfs-next Looks good. Thanks, Amir. FYI, I am going to be on vacation 6.15-rc3..6.15-rc5.
