> In sctp_sf_do_asconf(), SCTP_DISPOSITION_NOMEM error code returned
> from sctp_sf_heartbeat() represent a failure of sent HEARTBEAT. The
heartbeat?
Would the error predicate “return value != SCTP_DISPOSITION_CONSUME” be safer?
https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.14-rc6/source/include/net/sctp/sm.h#L43
> return value of sctp_sf_heartbeat() needs to be checked and propagates
> to caller function.
Will imperative wordings be more desirable for such a change description?
https://web.git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst?h=v6.14-rc6#n94
Regards,
Markus
