On Fri, Aug 22, 2025 at 02:58:34PM +0530, Dixit Parmar wrote: > On Fri, Aug 22, 2025 at 11:49 AM Andy Shevchenko > <andy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > I don't understand. Don't you have a subscription to linux-iio@ ML? > > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-iio/CAHp75VdL9kV2fyi63zqPZnW4CaeYPmJ74tmGEgU=M7FSYBv0ww@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx/T/#t > > If you found something new, please base it on that series as it was > > already sent and reviewed. > Thanks. I do have subscription to linux-iio@ML and did check the patch > series you mentioned. > That patch series by Xichao Zhao removes dev_err_probe() for -ENOMEM > cases whereas > this series is targeting slightly different cleanup of removing the > plain dev_err() log messages > that are there for -ENOMEM. I see, makes sense. > As far as I can see, both the series are modifying completely > different driver files without overlapping changes. > Since the objectives are related but independent and addressing > different type of change, I thought to keep > these patches in different patch series and have clear differentiation. > Although to establish similarity it would have made more sense If I > would have added the link to that patch series here. With this clarification it indeed may be applied independently. -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko
