Re: [PATCH v2 04/18] cpufreq: brcmstb-avs-cpufreq: Use __free(put_cpufreq_policy) for policy reference

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




在 2025/8/29 13:59, Viresh Kumar 写道:
On 27-08-25, 10:31, Zihuan Zhang wrote:
Replace the manual cpufreq_cpu_put() with __free(put_cpufreq_policy)
annotation for policy references. This reduces the risk of reference
counting mistakes and aligns the code with the latest kernel style.

No functional change intended.

Signed-off-by: Zihuan Zhang <zhangzihuan@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
  drivers/cpufreq/brcmstb-avs-cpufreq.c | 4 +---
  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)
Applied. Thanks.


Thanks for applying the patch!

I’ve been thinking further — instead of using __free directly, maybe we could introduce a small macro wrapper around it to make the release scope more controllable and consistent.

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/6174bcc8-30f5-479b-bac6-f42eb1232b4d@xxxxxxxxxx/

Do you think this would be a better approach, or should we just stick with the current use of __free?








[Index of Archives]     [Linux SoC Development]     [Linux Rockchip Development]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]    
  • [Linux on Unisoc (RDA Micro) SoCs]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux USB Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux SCSI]     [Yosemite News]

  •   Powered by Linux