> -----Original Message----- > From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@xxxxxxxxxx> > Sent: 29 August 2025 15:59 > To: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx>; Ravi Patel <ravi.patel@xxxxxxxxxxx> > Cc: jesper.nilsson@xxxxxxxx; mturquette@xxxxxxxxxxxx; sboyd@xxxxxxxxxx; robh@xxxxxxxxxx; krzk+dt@xxxxxxxxxx; conor+dt@xxxxxxxxxx; > s.nawrocki@xxxxxxxxxxx; cw00.choi@xxxxxxxxxxx; alim.akhtar@xxxxxxxxxxx; tomasz.figa@xxxxxxxxx; catalin.marinas@xxxxxxx; > will@xxxxxxxxxx; arnd@xxxxxxxx; ksk4725@xxxxxxxxxx; kenkim@xxxxxxxxxx; pjsin865@xxxxxxxxxx; gwk1013@xxxxxxxxxx; > hgkim05@xxxxxxxxxx; mingyoungbo@xxxxxxxxxx; smn1196@xxxxxxxxxx; pankaj.dubey@xxxxxxxxxxx; shradha.t@xxxxxxxxxxx; > inbaraj.e@xxxxxxxxxxx; swathi.ks@xxxxxxxxxxx; hrishikesh.d@xxxxxxxxxxx; dj76.yang@xxxxxxxxxxx; hypmean.kim@xxxxxxxxxxx; > linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-samsung-soc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxx; > linux-clk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; devicetree@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-gpio@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; soc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Priyadarsini G > <priya.ganesh@xxxxxxxxxxx> > Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 05/10] pinctrl: samsung: Add ARTPEC-8 SoC specific configuration > > On 29/08/2025 12:11, Linus Walleij wrote: > > Hi Ravi / SeonGu, > > > > thanks for your patch! > > > > On Mon, Aug 25, 2025 at 2:07 PM Ravi Patel <ravi.patel@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > >> From: SeonGu Kang <ksk4725@xxxxxxxxxx> > >> > >> Add Axis ARTPEC-8 SoC specific configuration data to enable pinctrl. > >> > >> Signed-off-by: SeonGu Kang <ksk4725@xxxxxxxxxx> > >> Signed-off-by: Priyadarsini G <priya.ganesh@xxxxxxxxxxx> > >> Signed-off-by: Ravi Patel <ravi.patel@xxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > Please avoid CC to soc@xxxxxxxxxx on these patches, they end up in the > > patchwork for immediate merging for SoC: > > https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-soc/patch/20250825114436.46882-6-ravi.patel@xxxxxxxxxxx/ > > Yeah, that's odd - most likely old CC-list. This could happen if using > b4 but there is no b4 being used here, so why Cc-ing according to some > old files? > > > > > I think this is not you intention, the pinctrl portions will be merged by > > Krzysztof who sends it to me once that part is finished reviewing. > Version for review should not be merged via soc@, so that's wrong > process in any case. But you are right that I will be taking everything, > thus soc@ is not involved at all. Ok, I will remove soc@ while sending next version. Thanks, Ravi > > Best regards, > Krzysztof
