On 01/09/2025 05:41, Ravi Patel wrote: > > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@xxxxxxxxxx> >> Sent: 31 August 2025 18:55 >> To: Ravi Patel <ravi.patel@xxxxxxxxxxx>; jesper.nilsson@xxxxxxxx; mturquette@xxxxxxxxxxxx; sboyd@xxxxxxxxxx; robh@xxxxxxxxxx; >> krzk+dt@xxxxxxxxxx; conor+dt@xxxxxxxxxx; s.nawrocki@xxxxxxxxxxx; cw00.choi@xxxxxxxxxxx; alim.akhtar@xxxxxxxxxxx; >> linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx; tomasz.figa@xxxxxxxxx; catalin.marinas@xxxxxxx; will@xxxxxxxxxx; arnd@xxxxxxxx >> Cc: ksk4725@xxxxxxxxxx; kenkim@xxxxxxxxxx; pjsin865@xxxxxxxxxx; gwk1013@xxxxxxxxxx; hgkim05@xxxxxxxxxx; >> mingyoungbo@xxxxxxxxxx; smn1196@xxxxxxxxxx; pankaj.dubey@xxxxxxxxxxx; shradha.t@xxxxxxxxxxx; inbaraj.e@xxxxxxxxxxx; >> swathi.ks@xxxxxxxxxxx; hrishikesh.d@xxxxxxxxxxx; dj76.yang@xxxxxxxxxxx; hypmean.kim@xxxxxxxxxxx; linux- >> kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-samsung-soc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxx; linux- >> clk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; devicetree@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-gpio@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; soc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >> Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 04/10] dt-bindings: pinctrl: samsung: Add compatible for ARTPEC-8 SoC >> >> On 25/08/2025 13:44, Ravi Patel wrote: >>> From: SeonGu Kang <ksk4725@xxxxxxxxxx> >>> >>> Document the compatible string for ARTPEC-8 SoC pinctrl block, >>> which is similar to other Samsung SoC pinctrl blocks. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: SeonGu Kang <ksk4725@xxxxxxxxxx> >>> Acked-by: Rob Herring (Arm) <robh@xxxxxxxxxx> >>> Signed-off-by: Ravi Patel <ravi.patel@xxxxxxxxxxx> >>> --- >>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/samsung,pinctrl.yaml | 1 + >>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) >> >> >> No wakeup-eint interrupts here? samsung,pinctrl-wakeup-interrupt.yaml? > > I don't see any use case for external wake-up interrupt here (as of now). It is more about hardware, not use case. Does this hardware has EINT wakeup pin banks? > So wakeup-eint entry is not present in dts and yaml both. Best regards, Krzysztof
