Hi Krzysztof,
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: 11 July 2025 12:51
> To: Devang Tailor <dev.tailor@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: robh@xxxxxxxxxx; krzk+dt@xxxxxxxxxx; conor+dt@xxxxxxxxxx;
> alim.akhtar@xxxxxxxxxxx; alexandre.belloni@xxxxxxxxxxx;
> devicetree@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-
> samsung-soc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-
> rtc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; faraz.ata@xxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] rtc: s3c: support for exynosautov9 on-chip RTC
>
> On Thu, Jul 10, 2025 at 02:04:33PM +0530, Devang Tailor wrote:
> > The on-chip RTC of this SoC is almost similar to the previous versions
> > of SoC. Hence re-use the existing driver with platform specific change
> > to enable RTC.
> >
> > This has been tested with 'hwclock' & 'date' utilities
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Devang Tailor <dev.tailor@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > drivers/rtc/rtc-s3c.c | 18 ++++++++++++++++++
> > 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/rtc/rtc-s3c.c b/drivers/rtc/rtc-s3c.c index
> > 5dd575865adf..8db24b6360b8 100644
> > --- a/drivers/rtc/rtc-s3c.c
> > +++ b/drivers/rtc/rtc-s3c.c
> > @@ -384,6 +384,15 @@ static void s3c6410_rtc_disable(struct s3c_rtc
> *info)
> > writew(con, info->base + S3C2410_RTCCON); }
> >
> > +static void exynosautov9_rtc_disable(struct s3c_rtc *info) {
> > + unsigned int con;
> > +
> > + con = readb(info->base + S3C2410_RTCCON);
> > + con &= ~S3C2410_RTCCON_RTCEN;
> > + writeb(con, info->base + S3C2410_RTCCON); }
>
> Looks a lot like s3c24xx_rtc_disable()...
>
> Anyway, if you keep ignoring the review, no point to provide reviews here.
>
I have removed the redundant code I had added in V1 considering your review comment for asymmetry code.
s3c24xx_rtc_disable() & s3c6410_rtc_disable() updates additional bit, which is not valid for ExynosAutov9 (only RTCCON[4:0] are valid), hence I added this and mentioned in V2 cover letter as well.
Please let me know if I am missing anything.
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
