On Fri, 04 Jul 2025, Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > pm_runtime_put_autosuspend(), pm_runtime_put_sync_autosuspend(), > pm_runtime_autosuspend() and pm_request_autosuspend() now include a call > to pm_runtime_mark_last_busy(). Remove the now-reduntant explicit call to > pm_runtime_mark_last_busy(). > > Signed-off-by: Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > The cover letter of the set can be found here > <URL:https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pm/20250704075225.3212486-1-sakari.ailus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>. > > In brief, this patch depends on PM runtime patches adding marking the last > busy timestamp in autosuspend related functions. The patches are here, on > rc2: > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rafael/linux-pm.git \ > pm-runtime-6.17-rc1 I would think it's better to wait for linux-pm to get merged to Linus' tree and then backmerged to drm after -rc1 instead of cross-merging that directly to drm. Regardless, for merging the i915 changes via whichever tree, Acked-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@xxxxxxxxx> -- Jani Nikula, Intel
