On Fri, 27 Jun 2025 10:15:25 +0100, André Draszik wrote:
> Document why the binding uses oneOf when specifying just one of the
> interrupt properties is supposed to be enough.
>
> dtschema's fixups.py has special treatment of the interrupts and
> interrupts-extended properties, but that appears to work at the top
> level only. Elsewhere, an explicit oneOf is required.
>
> [...]
Applied, thanks!
[1/1] dt-bindings: mfd: samsung,s2mps11: add comment about interrupts properties
commit: 37f716488780c4ce9e30a17f3c4ff9baee27c96d
--
Lee Jones [李琼斯]
