On Fri, 2025-06-27 at 11:12 +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 27/06/2025 10:54, André Draszik wrote:
> > Hi Krzysztof,
> >
> > On Thu, 2025-06-26 at 21:49 +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> > > On 24/05/2025 07:21, André Draszik wrote:
> > > > +
> > > > + gpio {
> > > > + compatible = "maxim,max77759-gpio";
> > > > +
> > > > + gpio-controller;
> > > > + #gpio-cells = <2>;
> > > > + /*
> > > > + * "Human-readable name [SIGNAL_LABEL]" where the
> > > > + * latter comes from the schematic
> > > > + */
> > > > + gpio-line-names = "OTG boost [OTG_BOOST_EN]",
> > > > + "max20339 IRQ [MW_OVP_INT_L]";
> > > > +
> > > > + interrupt-controller;
> > > > + #interrupt-cells = <2>;
> > > > + };
> > > > +
> > > > + nvmem-0 {
> > >
> > > Why is this called nvmem-0, not nvmem? Is there nvmem-1? I see binding
> > > does it, but why?
> >
> > 'nvmem' is used/declared by nvmem-consumer.yaml as a phandle array
> > already so using just 'nvmem' fails validation:
> >
> > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/maxim,max77759.example.dtb: pmic@66: nvmem: {'compatible': ['maxim,max77759-nvmem'], 'nvmem-
> > layout': {'compatible': ['fixed-layout'], '#address-cells': 1, '#size-cells': 1, 'reboot-mode@0': {'reg': [[0, 4]]},
> > 'boot-reason@4':
> > {'reg': [[4, 4]]}, 'shutdown-user-flag@8': {'reg': [[8, 1]]}, 'rsoc@10': {'reg': [[10, 2]]}}} is not of type 'array'
> > from schema $id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/nvmem/nvmem-consumer.yaml#
> >
> > https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250226-max77759-mfd-v2-3-a65ebe2bc0a9@xxxxxxxxxx/
> Heh, this should have been just folded into the parent as Rob suggested
> during v2
AFAICS and remember, the other discussion was about gpio properties only,
nothing about nvmem. And I addressed all gpio related comments I believe.
> Well, let's just merge it.
Thanks Krzysztof.
Cheers,
Andre'
