On Wed, Jun 25, 2025 at 04:05:34PM +0100, André Draszik wrote: > Hi Krzysztof, > > On Wed, 2025-06-11 at 10:08 +0100, André Draszik wrote: > > Hi Krzysztof, > > > > On Wed, 2025-06-11 at 11:04 +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > > > On Fri, Jun 06, 2025 at 04:02:57PM GMT, André Draszik wrote: > > > > Using lowercase for the buck and ldo nodenames is preferred, as > > > > evidenced e.g. in [1]. > > > > > > > > Convert the example here to lowercase before we add any bindings > > > > describing the s2mpg1x regulators that will enforce the spelling. > > > > > > > > Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250223-mysterious-infrared-civet-e5bcbf@krzk-bin/ [1] > > > > Signed-off-by: André Draszik <andre.draszik@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > > --- > > > > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/firmware/google,gs101-acpm-ipc.yaml | 4 ++-- > > > > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > > > > > So this is also a dependency for the rest of the patches? > > > > My thinking was that it makes sense to have it in context with > > the other patches, but it indeed could go stand-alone if that's the > > preference. > > Can you take just that patch as-is from this series (then it's at > least out of the way :-), or should I resend it separately? No. If you take it out, then the rest of the series will have warnings. Rob