> > https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250519184530.21845-1-wsa+renesas@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > I see my approach of using generic i2c-X was also preferred by Rob, so I > guess it won't get it. Okay, if you guys say so... > I sent patch for Samsung, with reported-by credits for you (it's also > reported now by my tests and earlier by Rob's as well, though). I will fix the AT91-based Calao boards somewhen, and then I consider this case closed for me. Thank you both for guidance!
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
